Wars and Rumors of Wars: Things are About to Come to a Dangerous Head in Syria and Iran


Events are beginning to rush downhill like crazy. You might remember that the U.S. administration stated that Syria may have used chemical weapons against the rebels and/or civilians. This stance continued even as France, others and even the U.N., I believe, said it happened as a matter of fact. The problem was that President Obama drew a line in the sand at the use of chemical weapons as a pretext for U.S. involvement. To admit that it has happened is either to back one’s words up with action or prove those words to be just rhetoric which would have ramifications in our dealings with North Korea’s and Iran’s nuclear programs. So, what has changed? A few things, I believe.

Soldiers loyal to the Syrian regime gesture while on their military vehicle in the village of Debaa near Qusair, after the Syrian army took control of the village from rebel fighters June 7, 2013. REUTERS/Rami Bleible http://news.yahoo.com/lightbox/soldiers-loyal-syrian-regime-gesture-while-military-vehicle-photo-093814617.html
Iranian backed Hezbollah, which was rumored to be backing the Syrian regime of Assad with its own fighters, went public and all in, helping to turn the tide in a key city in Syria which fell back into the hands of the regime. Russia is sending S-300 missiles to Assad in a bid, as they say, to help saner heads prevail. On the ground, the help of Russian arms sales already in country, Hezbollah’s troops and Iranian assistance have turned events totally in the direction of the regime of Assad. Without a heavyweight on the Syrian rebel side, foreign fighters and Sunni majority countries’ aid notwithstanding, the war is theirs to lose.


The American change of heart has been mushrooming. Senator McCain has been putting immense pressure on the administration and there are other advocates of intervention from within the Republican ranks. In addition, President Clinton just joined Sen. McCain in advocating for direct action short of boots on the ground. A clear signal on future intentions happened with a presidential announcement that two known humanitarian-interventionists (that means that they believe that action must be taken to prevent genocide and avoid future Rwandas and Bosnias) would be promoted within the Obama administration: Susan Rice to be the president’s National Security advisor and Samantha Power to be ambassador at the United Nations. Just today, the administration changed its tune and said definitively that the Syrian regime has repeatedly used chemical weapons on a small scale in its fight against the rebels.

Events are falling into place quickly. The question is who will move the quickest and farthest: Russia or the U.S. and its allies? Everything hinges on the answer to that question.

As for the United States, if President Obama plans on reversing the tide, he must act with deliberate speed. If he plans on airstrikes, he may feel compelled to do so before the Russian S300's arrive, are assembled and ready to take down planes. So, look for some pretty swift moving of events, in my opinion. Of course, he may seek to soften up their defenses with cruise missiles first, then the stealth attack craft and then our F-series fighters. That is, if he goes beyond arming the rebels on the ground. It sounds like it is a critical hour and the only real way to reverse the regime's momentum is to degrade Syria's ability to fight by U.S. led bombing runs.



The only one who can change this calculus is Russia. Netanyahu visited Auschwitz and it sounds like Israel is ready to attack Iran on its own. Russia could declare an attack on either Syria or Iran as an attack on them, make sure they have Russian military personnel in the danger zones, deliver and deploy the S-300's (especially if operated by Russian military personnel) and Israel and the US and/or its allies are stuck wringing their hands or risking taking on Russia too. Perhaps Putin is calculating that they already have enough of a presence to dissuade the U.S. and its allies from either a no-fly zone and/or air strikes by the moving of war ships to Syria not to mention their naval port at Tartus. To complicate things further, thousands of Russians live and work in Syria (see Tartus link). Let's continue to watch and pray. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Call to be a Ragamuffin: A Review of the Movie on Rich Mullins' Life

Image
I thought this film was absolutely great.  The acting was good and the story was real.  Shocked and saddened at the ghosts of Rich's childhood, if I may use that terminology, I was drawn into the healthy and unhealthy ways he struggled with his raising.   Like the Bible does with its heroes, Ragamuffin doesn't sugarcoat Rich's life.  He struggled with smoking and with alcohol.  His language wasn't always church language, to put it mildly.  One sees someone seeking to be real.  Tired of the masks Christians often put on and the blindness to the call of Christ to provide for the least of these, Rich gives generously to Christian churches and charities while living humbly.  Seeing the poverty of others and the difference he could make in the lives of those with less, Rich Mullins pours himself wholly into ministry.   Just a few other thoughts in closing.  His tragic death is handled well.  In  the special features section, Dav e, Rich's brother, does a
Read more

What's In a Name?

Image
What’s in a Name?  In 1990, I graduated from Philadelphia College of Bible.  Over the years, PCB changed and with it, its name altered as well.  After achieving university status under President Babb, a new name was chosen, Philadelphia Biblical University, one that does not easily roll off the tongue.  Eventually, students, alumni, the community, etc., got used to it like will eventually happen with the new name change.  However, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t reasons to wrestle with the proposal.   The rationale for the name change Dr. Williams, current president of PBU, argues that there is a perception of PBU being a Bible college with “university” in its name, leading people to believe that it has “limited offerings and a narrow vocational focus.”  My thought:  The word narrow sounds familiar to me.   Matthew 7:13-14 Furthermore, market research conducted via focus groups and a survey yielded data that was considered in favor of a name change in gene
Read more

Reproducible Pastoral Training - A Book Review

Image
Reproducible Pastoral Training: Church Planting Guidelines from the Teachings of George Patterson by Patrick O’Connor is a book about missions. However, its insights are also helpful to anyone who is either starting a church or seeking to see it grow. Patrick O’Connor dives into the wisdom of George Patterson and presents it in an intelligent way. Various topics are explained in the text. How does one reach a culture with the Gospel of Jesus Christ? What is better, door-to-door evangelism or another technique? Is it best to begin with a multi-cultural church or to start with one culture? How does one utilize contacts for the sake of the Gospel? Also, how does one prevent establishing a foreign church rather than a native one? Furthermore, the author goes into issues like how leaders are trained and when they should begin serving. I found myself revisiting preconceived notions of what is done in Western churches and thus is considered to be biblical. For instance, the d
Read more